Twitter Labels Major Medical Journal “Unsafe”
Orwell himself could not have predicted the power and perversion of Anthony Fauci.
Twitter users no doubt will be comforted to know that the tech giant, which we are told takes its censorship orders directly from the Biden White House, is now attempting to shield you from the “potentially spammy or unsafe” side effects of reading a major medical journal.
Today if you go to Twitter and attempt to click the link to the esteemed journal, titled Circulation, you will receive this message:
Warning: this link may be unsafe
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10712
The link you are trying to access has been identified by Twitter or our partners as being potentially spammy or unsafe, in accordance with Twitter’s URL Policy. This link could fall into any of the below categories:
malicious links that could steal personal information or harm electronic devices
spammy links that mislead people or disrupt their experience
violent or misleading content that could lead to real-world harm
certain categories of content that, if posted directly on Twitter, are a violation of the Twitter Rules
If you dare to risk life and limb, you can continue to read the article, which is actually a provocative scientific study, but don’t say that Twitter didn’t warn you. Indeed, if you are immunized with either a Pfizer or Moderna Covid-19 vaccine, the results of the study are highly likely to cause you indigestion at the very least.
From the abstract:
“A total of 566 pts, aged 28 to 97, M:F ratio 1:1 seen in a preventive cardiology practice had a new PULS test drawn from 2 to 10 weeks following the 2nd COVID shot and was compared to the previous PULS score drawn 3 to 5 months previously pre- shot. Baseline IL-16 increased from 35=/-20 above the norm to 82 =/- 75 above the norm post-vac; sFas increased from 22+/- 15 above the norm to 46=/-24 above the norm post-vac; HGF increased from 42+/-12 above the norm to 86+/-31 above the norm post-vac. These changes resulted in an increase of the PULS score from 11% 5 yr ACS risk to 25% 5 yr ACS risk. At the time of this report, these changes persist for at least 2.5 months post second dose of vac. We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.”
In plain English, both the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines were shown to more than double the risk of a heart attack.
Twitter apparently thinks it better for your health that you simply not know this. Ignorance is bliss in The New Normal.
Boosters anyone?
Twitter is following the $cience.
Alex posted this study on Nov. 22. For months I have been begging my mother-in-law not to get the booster. They both have cardiac issues and they both got the 2 doses of the Moderna jab. She said she was going to talk to her doctor about it before she did. I said, "I can tell you what he'll say." I forwarded Alex's Substack and said, "Maybe take this information to your doctor when you ask if he advises a booster shot of more spike protein. I wouldn’t be advising you not to do another jab without evidence. Here’s more of it." But like my husband says, she will do what she wants regardless. Everyone else in his family of origin has gotten the jab including nephews in the myocarditis roulette age group. We are the outliers.