Pfizer just tweeted - Deep vein thrombosis (#DVT), a blood clot in a deep vein, can travel to the lungs, leading to a pulmonary embolism (#PE). Symptoms of PE include difficulty breathing and chest pain. Contact your doctor if experiencing symptoms—this is no time to wait.
Once the vaccine increases autism link was known they didn't pull the vaccines. Pulling them would have required a public reason. Rather than face the music they allowed it to continue.
Good question. As an elementary school teacher, I likely would not be able to tell the difference between a child who developed autism from vaccination vs. from some other cause. However, vaccine-induced autism often presents as regressive autism -- where the toddler is developing normally and hitting all his milestones, then suddenly begins regressing and losing learned skills, including speech. Also, vaccine-induced autism is often accompanied by serious bowel problems (e.g. chronic severe constipation) and extreme food sensitivities.
This is shocking & horrifying. It is known side affects that are deliberately hidden & the pharma cos will pocket their billions & are safe from accountability.....again.
I appeciate your sarcasm, though other people will not. I have been reading about how the Omega 3 Fatty Acid DHA maintains flexibility in the blood vessels so, I guess, clots do not form.
If people had enough DHA in their bodies, plus vitamins and minerals, there would be no need for vaccines to keep them alive.
"The agency used this exact same strategy when the rate of autism exploded shortly after Congress passed the now-infamous 1986 law giving vaccine makers blanket immunity from lawsuits for injuries caused by their products." Is there a graph showing that increase?
That rise is concerning. Here is a different graph tying it to use of glyphosate. When the cause is uncertain, it would be good to perform studies. A blinded and randomized study where vaccines are not given to some kids would clear this up. But I'm sure bio-ethics and legal reasons will be used to prevent such a study.
The problem is that our world is awash with so many toxins that it's nigh on impossible to tease out the particular cause of all these maladies. Isolating variables of this kind would take extraordinary measures (extremely controlled living conditions over many years).
And it doesn't have to be one or the other. It could be that both (and/or other toxins) contribute to autism as well as so many other conditions.
That's exactly the problem. Once you've already legalized something and seeded its purported importance to the public, you can't find enough people who don't care if their kids are vaccinated or not to do such a study. Everyone has a strong opinion, one way or the other.
Thanks for the link. According to the graph, the rate already rose 5x from 1970 to 1985. Since then it kept rising by 3-5x per decade. That rise even before 1986 seems to contradict the vaccine liability shield being the cause.
It depends on what data you're looking at. But the first cohort in which a dramatic increase in autism can be seen, based on the studies I've reviewed in the U.S. and in some other countries, is 1987, which is the year that new vaccines were first added both here and abroad.
As someone who tends not to believe anything I hear without solid evidence, I think we need lots of high-quality studies. Personally, I think the common advice to reduce the risk of SIDS by having infants sleep on their backs and not get too comfortable is maybe having negative side effects. Sleep and dreaming are important but poorly understood aspects of brain development and function.
I've heard of some parents (MDs) whose baby ended up with a flattened skull due to hard-surface sleeping and then got a special helmet to try to make the skull round again.
I agree with you completely. We need robust studies. Unfortunately, the government and drug companies have spent the past 30 years blocking studies of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated children. There is only one reason for them to block these studies.
Maybe but the rise still coincides with the increase in number of vaccinations a child receives. In 1962 there were 3 shots between birth and early adulthood. Now I think it is 61 shots. There are many more shots now during first year than throughout all of childhood in the 70's. The immunity shield in 1986 was put in place -- I think --- because problems were known. Once put in place pharma just took advantage and began reccomending more shots.
Are vaccines the only reason for a rise in autism? I don't think so but I do think that they are a large enough of a contributing factor. Most people think that's quackery and those who are moved to check often do a cursory check and conclude...safe and effective. The reality is that there are many red flags around vaccines and autism.
Prior to the covid stuff pharma was lobbying in states for mandatory vaccines for children in order for them to attend school. Where I live they were successful in removing the religious/philosophical exemption. There were similarities to the public covid vax view with many parents who had their children fully vaxxed advocating that it be mandatory for all children so their children would be protected. If the vaccines are effective their children were protected regardless of whether or not classmates were but like with mandates for covid vax it didn't make any sense.
That's exactly right. The immunity shield for vaccine makers was adopted precisely because the companies were getting sued for major injuries to children. The immunity shield greatly accelerated the trends that were already occurring.
Thank you for this. I have no doubt about vaccine-induced autism. Heart attacks and strokes in children are also being normalised! I know doctors who are very worried about what's going in here in Melbourne but keeping quiet to save their jobs.
I particularly liked your analysis of the NEJM paper and that you picked up on the exclusion of the MIS-C cases. When two studies came out that purported to establish that vaccine-induced MIS-C is "very rare", that made me suspicious. This is my contribution: https://stickybeak.substack.com/p/heading-into-the-perfect-cytokine?r=j4be7
Pfizer just tweeted - Deep vein thrombosis (#DVT), a blood clot in a deep vein, can travel to the lungs, leading to a pulmonary embolism (#PE). Symptoms of PE include difficulty breathing and chest pain. Contact your doctor if experiencing symptoms—this is no time to wait.
https://nakedemperor.substack.com/
Amazing. No words.
I get blood clots on my hands all the time. That darn cat! A scab is a blood clot, isn't it?
Did you IV your cats?
No, we just play around and she doesn't know her own strength (and sharpness). And I would never declaw a cat!
Yes, it's a horrible practice.
Once the vaccine increases autism link was known they didn't pull the vaccines. Pulling them would have required a public reason. Rather than face the music they allowed it to continue.
Just curious about autism. Does vaccine induced autism somehow present differently from non-vaccine autism? Any personal experience?
Good question. As an elementary school teacher, I likely would not be able to tell the difference between a child who developed autism from vaccination vs. from some other cause. However, vaccine-induced autism often presents as regressive autism -- where the toddler is developing normally and hitting all his milestones, then suddenly begins regressing and losing learned skills, including speech. Also, vaccine-induced autism is often accompanied by serious bowel problems (e.g. chronic severe constipation) and extreme food sensitivities.
This is just absolutely despicable! These people are awful 😣
Unfreaking unbelievable....just so evil.
https://thecovidworld.com/covid-vaccines-are-causing-micro-blood-clots-in-millions-and-theres-no-medical-solution/
This is shocking & horrifying. It is known side affects that are deliberately hidden & the pharma cos will pocket their billions & are safe from accountability.....again.
I appeciate your sarcasm, though other people will not. I have been reading about how the Omega 3 Fatty Acid DHA maintains flexibility in the blood vessels so, I guess, clots do not form.
If people had enough DHA in their bodies, plus vitamins and minerals, there would be no need for vaccines to keep them alive.
Mass murderers.
"The agency used this exact same strategy when the rate of autism exploded shortly after Congress passed the now-infamous 1986 law giving vaccine makers blanket immunity from lawsuits for injuries caused by their products." Is there a graph showing that increase?
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Z4sTYC3M7Lk/maxresdefault.jpg
That rise is concerning. Here is a different graph tying it to use of glyphosate. When the cause is uncertain, it would be good to perform studies. A blinded and randomized study where vaccines are not given to some kids would clear this up. But I'm sure bio-ethics and legal reasons will be used to prevent such a study.
https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Graph-of-US-rates-of-autism-prevalence-in-first-grade-served-under-IDEA-compared-with_fig15_271724900
The problem is that our world is awash with so many toxins that it's nigh on impossible to tease out the particular cause of all these maladies. Isolating variables of this kind would take extraordinary measures (extremely controlled living conditions over many years).
And it doesn't have to be one or the other. It could be that both (and/or other toxins) contribute to autism as well as so many other conditions.
That's exactly the problem. Once you've already legalized something and seeded its purported importance to the public, you can't find enough people who don't care if their kids are vaccinated or not to do such a study. Everyone has a strong opinion, one way or the other.
https://tobyrogers.substack.com/p/the-political-economy-of-autism
Thanks for the link. According to the graph, the rate already rose 5x from 1970 to 1985. Since then it kept rising by 3-5x per decade. That rise even before 1986 seems to contradict the vaccine liability shield being the cause.
It depends on what data you're looking at. But the first cohort in which a dramatic increase in autism can be seen, based on the studies I've reviewed in the U.S. and in some other countries, is 1987, which is the year that new vaccines were first added both here and abroad.
As someone who tends not to believe anything I hear without solid evidence, I think we need lots of high-quality studies. Personally, I think the common advice to reduce the risk of SIDS by having infants sleep on their backs and not get too comfortable is maybe having negative side effects. Sleep and dreaming are important but poorly understood aspects of brain development and function.
I've heard of some parents (MDs) whose baby ended up with a flattened skull due to hard-surface sleeping and then got a special helmet to try to make the skull round again.
I agree with you completely. We need robust studies. Unfortunately, the government and drug companies have spent the past 30 years blocking studies of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated children. There is only one reason for them to block these studies.
Maybe but the rise still coincides with the increase in number of vaccinations a child receives. In 1962 there were 3 shots between birth and early adulthood. Now I think it is 61 shots. There are many more shots now during first year than throughout all of childhood in the 70's. The immunity shield in 1986 was put in place -- I think --- because problems were known. Once put in place pharma just took advantage and began reccomending more shots.
Are vaccines the only reason for a rise in autism? I don't think so but I do think that they are a large enough of a contributing factor. Most people think that's quackery and those who are moved to check often do a cursory check and conclude...safe and effective. The reality is that there are many red flags around vaccines and autism.
Prior to the covid stuff pharma was lobbying in states for mandatory vaccines for children in order for them to attend school. Where I live they were successful in removing the religious/philosophical exemption. There were similarities to the public covid vax view with many parents who had their children fully vaxxed advocating that it be mandatory for all children so their children would be protected. If the vaccines are effective their children were protected regardless of whether or not classmates were but like with mandates for covid vax it didn't make any sense.
That's exactly right. The immunity shield for vaccine makers was adopted precisely because the companies were getting sued for major injuries to children. The immunity shield greatly accelerated the trends that were already occurring.
The words "safe and effective" have been losing their luster lately. Widespread skepticism of public-health guidance may be an upside of COVID-19.
Another link that you may find interesting:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/jake-tapper-sold-soul-pharma-rfk-jr/
Great article! Thanks for sharing!
To be fair, it’s showing that this was posted by the CDC in February of 2020.
Thank you for this. I have no doubt about vaccine-induced autism. Heart attacks and strokes in children are also being normalised! I know doctors who are very worried about what's going in here in Melbourne but keeping quiet to save their jobs.
I particularly liked your analysis of the NEJM paper and that you picked up on the exclusion of the MIS-C cases. When two studies came out that purported to establish that vaccine-induced MIS-C is "very rare", that made me suspicious. This is my contribution: https://stickybeak.substack.com/p/heading-into-the-perfect-cytokine?r=j4be7