CDC Won't Answer ANY of These Questions

Help me force the agency to respond.

In this era of drug-industry sponsored “journalism,” combined with extreme censorship of those who do not answer to the drug industry, the CDC has become accustomed to answering really tough questions like these:

• How many safe and effective Covid-19 vaccines have been administered in the U.S.?

• What else can the CDC do to punish more Americans who refuse to take the safe and effective vaccines?

• Why hasn’t the CDC shut down air travel to those who refuse to take the safe and effective vaccines?

What the CDC no longer is used to doing is answering real questions from concerned members of the public and those who represent them. What’s worse, the agency apparently believes it is under no obligation to do so.

My communication with Scott Pauley, press officer in the CDC’s Division of Public Affairs, began on November 10. To date he has not answered a single one of my questions.

My growing list of questions is presented in five parts (below). Please take a few minutes to read these questions yourself. If you think any of them have merit, consider contacting Scott Pauley by phone or email and insisting that he either answer the questions or put us in touch with someone from the CDC who can. We, the taxpayers, provide his salary. He does not have the right to ignore our questions. Not being able to offer any good answers is no excuse.

Scott Pauley

Office: 404-718-3728

Mobile: 404-661-2490

Email: pvq2@cdc.gov       

Here are my questions:

Part 1 - Dosing for Children

1) The Pfizer vaccine for children ages 5 to 11 is one-third the adult dose and is based strictly on age. I realize these products are being called vaccines, but in truth, they could also be called gene therapy drugs.  I looked up a number of gene therapy drugs and could find none that were dosed based on age.  They were all based on either weight or lab values.  Otherwise, the dose was the same for everyone.  Since these vaccines involve gene therapy, why is the dosing not similar to that of other gene therapy drugs?

2) If the dose for children ostensibly was determined based on the production of antibodies in the clinical trial for this age group, why did Pfizer not bother to test the antibody response after the first dose?  How do we know, based on the Pfizer clinical trial for the 5 to 11 age group, that one dose is not enough in this age group to achieve the desired antibody response?

3) Even if we were to agree that these vaccines are like traditional vaccines, and thus should be dosed like traditional vaccines, not drugs, I could find no other vaccine in which pre-pubescent children who are one year apart in age receive such different doses of the same vaccine. Can you point me to another vaccine where an 11-year-old boy and a 12-year-boy, neither of whom has reached puberty, would receive widely different doses of the same vaccine?  (In the case of the Covid-19 vaccine, the 12-year-old will receive three times the dose of the 11-year-old.)  If not this specific example, can you cite another example, with any other vaccine, that would be similar? What is the scientific rationale for administering such different doses of the Covid-19 vaccine to two boys a year apart in age who may differ little physiologically?

4) Related to question #3, the CDC recommends that if an 11-year-old child turns 12 between his/her first and second dose of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine, that child should get the adult dose for the second shot.  What happens physiologically to a child between the ages of 11 years, 364 days and 11 years, 365 days to justify the child now needing a second dose that is three times larger than his/her first dose? Again, this cannot be based on antibody response in the clinical trial, since apparently that was not tested after the first dose for any child in the trial.

Part 2 - Exemptions

I have interviewed [the wife of] a man in Los Angeles who suffered an eye injury, which resulted in double vision, after his first dose of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine.  He consulted an ophthalmologist, who diagnosed him with nerve palsy and instructed him to wear an eye patch for the next several months with hopes that the nerve will heal.  The doctor also told him that the injury was definitely due to the vaccine.  She said she has seen a lot of these particular injuries, but usually after the second dose, not the first.  She told him he definitely SHOULD NOT get the second dose or any boosters.  He asked the doctor to write him an exemption; otherwise, he will be fired from his job in early December.  Subsequently, the doctor told him that the head of the department in the Kaiser - Los Angeles program where she works said exemptions are not allowed for eye injuries.  He said eye injuries are a known side effect of the vaccine, and that since it is not fatal, Kaiser is not giving exemptions for those who got injured from the first shot.  (By this standard, Kaiser appears to be offering no exemptions to anyone, regardless of the severity of the reaction. I contacted Kaiser management. They, too, refused to answer my questions about its exemption policy.)

What is the CDC's position on exemptions? After which types of Covid-19 vaccine injuries, specifically, following a first dose should people receive an exemption from taking their second dose?  Please provide a YES or NO answer to each of the following (If the CDC defers to doctors, I will assume this means that the agency is okay with people being required to get a second dose after any one of these injuries that occur after the first dose):

• Blood Clots

• Stroke

• Heart Attack

• Myocarditis

• Pericarditis

• Neurological Disorders

• Eye Injuries

• Tinnitus

• Chronic Headache

• Seizure

• Anaphylaxis

Part 3 - Eye Injuries

Covid-19 vaccine-induced eye injuries are serious and disabling.  They appear to be common, as the doctor in the above case has noted.  I have even seen some reports in VAERS of "blindness" following Covid-19 vaccination.

1) How are Covid-19 vaccines causing eye injuries?

2) What types of eye injuries has the CDC confirmed from these vaccines?

3) Why are consumers not being warned about the possibility of eye injuries from these vaccines?

4) Has anyone lost their vision entirely from any of the Covid-19 vaccines? If so, what are the prospects for recovering their vision?

5) What is the recommended treatment for these eye injuries?

6) What is the prognosis for recovery from these injuries?

Part 4 - Autopsies

The VAERS lists 72 children and teens who have suffered fatal reactions to a Covid-19 vaccine. 

1) How many autopsies of these children and teens have been requested by the CDC?

2) How many autopsies have been completed?

3) Where can I find the reports for those completed autopsies?

4) If the CDC has not asked for any autopsies of these children and teens, how will the CDC determine the cause of death in each case?

Part 5 - CDC employee vaccination

The director of the CDC was recently asked by Congress what percent of CDC employees have been fully vaccinated.  She said she didn't know. Since the Covid-19 vaccine is mandated for federal employees, the CDC must be keeping track of this data.

1) What percent of CDC employees are fully vaccinated?

2) Why are any employees at the CDC not fully vaccinated by now?

What do you think of this list? What questions would you like to add?

Please comment below, then share far and wide.