I laughed out loud when i got to this part: "What happens physiologically to a child between the ages of 11 years, 364 days and 11 years, 365 days to justify the child now needing a second dose that is three times larger than his/her first dose?"
You are hitting some excellent points!! I'll do my part and call and email and urge them to provide answers to all journalists' questions, and will cite some of these questions directly if that's OK. I just hope I don't start seeing black vans outside my house or following me when I leave the house...
I was particularly triggered hearing Rochel Walensky's testifying saying she did not know what % of her/CDC employees are vaccinated. I wish to goodness that senator would have said, "OK, ok. I get you do not know what it is right this second, but what was it the last time you heard?" She would of course say, I dunno I'll have to get that for you, then if only he would have pressed once more "well what was it the last time you recall hearing anything along these lines". I was shocked and disgusted she shirked that question. If she can't answer anything along those lines in real time that is really telling.
As much as I would LOVE to see answers to all this, I wonder this is biting off more than they can chew. I wonder if you asked one simple question would they maybe see that as less threatening and easier to respond to? Like what's the justification for the differing dose requirements for 11 and 12 prepubescents, across the board regardless of everything other than one day of age in some situations.
Thank you, Deen. Whatever you can do to help is very much appreciated.
I did start out on Nov. 10 with just a couple of questions, related to the exemption policy. I soon realized that the CDC did not like those particular questions, so I moved on to the next topic of concern to me: child dosing of the Pfizer vax. The agency ignored those questions, too. So I tried asking about the next topic. I quickly discovered that they had no intention of answering any of my questions. Clearly, they are not ordering autopsies for any of the kids listed in VAERS as being killed by the vaccine. They have no official policy regarding exemptions after injuries, because that would require them to acknowledge that the injuries are occurring. There simply is no logical, scientific answer for the difference in dosing between 11 and 12 year olds, so they're taking a hard pass on that one as well. Maybe eventually they will be forced to answer how many CDC employees refused the vaccine. Maybe...
I called Scott Pauly's office number that you provided and asked him some questions. I was surprised to get his voice on the voicemail. I think that'd be great if we had a bunch of people calling and asking some of these questions, or any others that we have. 👍🏼
Thank you! You are awesome! I hope others will call him as well. It will be easy for him to ignore one person (me). It will be much harder to ignore numerous people who are asking the same questions.
Unfortunately, it seems that's what it's come to. You shouldn't have to submit a FOIA just to get an answer to a basic question. When this is all over, I hope the CDC is not just abolished but actually demolished!
Awesome work Darby Shaw! I'm in Australia but if it's ok with you, I will ask our own corrupt version of CDC- The TGA and ATGI. One question i would REALLY REALLY like answered, from the very beginning of the whole vaccine campaign, by ANY of these regulatory bodies and Pharmaceutical companies, -
What's the cut limit number? Ie.
What was the number of deaths specified within the clinical trial documents, as being the acceptable loss limit? What number did they set as a signal to end the trial for safety reasons?
I've heard in the past it was 26. Dr Jessica Rose mentioned this number in a podcast but I can't find any documentation to support this.
Thank you! And yes, please do share these questions with your own corrupt version of the CDC in Australia. I would love to hear their response!
I, too, would like to know what the number of acceptable vaccine deaths was supposed to be. I never heard any number. I think maybe 26 was the number who died in the swine flu vaccine campaign by the time that campaign was canceled. But maybe I'm mistaken.
I would also like to know NNTV (number needed to vaccinate). If we need to vaccinate 1 million kids to save 1 life for example, but vaccines cause death in 1 in 500,000 then the vaccines should not be administered. I don’t believe they know a number because the trials were so small. It’s appalling what’s passing for science these days.
No reason for doctors to refuse medical exemptions these days for a covid-19 vaccine, otherwise it's willful misconduct with all the legal protection they currently enjoy.
Excellent questions, Darby. I would like to add the question: Why are children not being tested for natural immunity before being jabbed with this gene therapy agent since it is estimated that 70% of children have already had covid? Dr. Harvey Risch had an excellent interview with Jan Jekielek at Epoch Times' American Thought Leaders. I highly recommend it. I've heard the 70% number several times - it may have been in the ATL interview (in 2 parts) with Dr. Paul Alexander. He has an article about 135 studies about natural immunity and is very outspoken about not injecting children. https://brownstone.org/articles/79-research-studies-affirm-naturally-acquired-immunity-to-covid-19-documented-linked-and-quoted/ If you're not familiar with the Brownstone Institute, it is a good site. I will contact the CDC with my questions. Steve Kirsch has a link on his Substack newsletter to comment on the OSHA mandates which I also did tonight.
Also, on another advocacy note, people need to call/write their senators and ask them to vote against HR 550 which was passed in the House with 80 Republican (RINO) votes. It is named the Immunization Infrastructure Modernization Act and is pure surveillance of Americans' vaccination status which violates our medical liberty.
The crickets you’re hearing are the CDC’s way of disclosing what they really think about us. Those are all excellent questions deserving of answers.
I laughed out loud when i got to this part: "What happens physiologically to a child between the ages of 11 years, 364 days and 11 years, 365 days to justify the child now needing a second dose that is three times larger than his/her first dose?"
You are hitting some excellent points!! I'll do my part and call and email and urge them to provide answers to all journalists' questions, and will cite some of these questions directly if that's OK. I just hope I don't start seeing black vans outside my house or following me when I leave the house...
I was particularly triggered hearing Rochel Walensky's testifying saying she did not know what % of her/CDC employees are vaccinated. I wish to goodness that senator would have said, "OK, ok. I get you do not know what it is right this second, but what was it the last time you heard?" She would of course say, I dunno I'll have to get that for you, then if only he would have pressed once more "well what was it the last time you recall hearing anything along these lines". I was shocked and disgusted she shirked that question. If she can't answer anything along those lines in real time that is really telling.
As much as I would LOVE to see answers to all this, I wonder this is biting off more than they can chew. I wonder if you asked one simple question would they maybe see that as less threatening and easier to respond to? Like what's the justification for the differing dose requirements for 11 and 12 prepubescents, across the board regardless of everything other than one day of age in some situations.
Thank you, Deen. Whatever you can do to help is very much appreciated.
I did start out on Nov. 10 with just a couple of questions, related to the exemption policy. I soon realized that the CDC did not like those particular questions, so I moved on to the next topic of concern to me: child dosing of the Pfizer vax. The agency ignored those questions, too. So I tried asking about the next topic. I quickly discovered that they had no intention of answering any of my questions. Clearly, they are not ordering autopsies for any of the kids listed in VAERS as being killed by the vaccine. They have no official policy regarding exemptions after injuries, because that would require them to acknowledge that the injuries are occurring. There simply is no logical, scientific answer for the difference in dosing between 11 and 12 year olds, so they're taking a hard pass on that one as well. Maybe eventually they will be forced to answer how many CDC employees refused the vaccine. Maybe...
I called Scott Pauly's office number that you provided and asked him some questions. I was surprised to get his voice on the voicemail. I think that'd be great if we had a bunch of people calling and asking some of these questions, or any others that we have. 👍🏼
Thank you! You are awesome! I hope others will call him as well. It will be easy for him to ignore one person (me). It will be much harder to ignore numerous people who are asking the same questions.
FOIA, and legal action. Otherwise just an exercise in futility.
Unfortunately, it seems that's what it's come to. You shouldn't have to submit a FOIA just to get an answer to a basic question. When this is all over, I hope the CDC is not just abolished but actually demolished!
Awesome work Darby Shaw! I'm in Australia but if it's ok with you, I will ask our own corrupt version of CDC- The TGA and ATGI. One question i would REALLY REALLY like answered, from the very beginning of the whole vaccine campaign, by ANY of these regulatory bodies and Pharmaceutical companies, -
What's the cut limit number? Ie.
What was the number of deaths specified within the clinical trial documents, as being the acceptable loss limit? What number did they set as a signal to end the trial for safety reasons?
I've heard in the past it was 26. Dr Jessica Rose mentioned this number in a podcast but I can't find any documentation to support this.
Thank you! And yes, please do share these questions with your own corrupt version of the CDC in Australia. I would love to hear their response!
I, too, would like to know what the number of acceptable vaccine deaths was supposed to be. I never heard any number. I think maybe 26 was the number who died in the swine flu vaccine campaign by the time that campaign was canceled. But maybe I'm mistaken.
Yes, I think your right re the swine flu. I know there's a technical terminology used for this "cut point". It escapes my memory. Do know?
I don't know the technical term. In business terms, it's "go, no go." These vaccines clearly should have been a NO GO.
I would also like to know NNTV (number needed to vaccinate). If we need to vaccinate 1 million kids to save 1 life for example, but vaccines cause death in 1 in 500,000 then the vaccines should not be administered. I don’t believe they know a number because the trials were so small. It’s appalling what’s passing for science these days.
It is indeed appalling how small (and short) these trials were.
No reason for doctors to refuse medical exemptions these days for a covid-19 vaccine, otherwise it's willful misconduct with all the legal protection they currently enjoy.
https://guessname.substack.com/p/checkmate-doctor?
Excellent questions, Darby. I would like to add the question: Why are children not being tested for natural immunity before being jabbed with this gene therapy agent since it is estimated that 70% of children have already had covid? Dr. Harvey Risch had an excellent interview with Jan Jekielek at Epoch Times' American Thought Leaders. I highly recommend it. I've heard the 70% number several times - it may have been in the ATL interview (in 2 parts) with Dr. Paul Alexander. He has an article about 135 studies about natural immunity and is very outspoken about not injecting children. https://brownstone.org/articles/79-research-studies-affirm-naturally-acquired-immunity-to-covid-19-documented-linked-and-quoted/ If you're not familiar with the Brownstone Institute, it is a good site. I will contact the CDC with my questions. Steve Kirsch has a link on his Substack newsletter to comment on the OSHA mandates which I also did tonight.
Also, on another advocacy note, people need to call/write their senators and ask them to vote against HR 550 which was passed in the House with 80 Republican (RINO) votes. It is named the Immunization Infrastructure Modernization Act and is pure surveillance of Americans' vaccination status which violates our medical liberty.
Fantastic list! I've had many of the same questions!